Home > Litter
 | | | |
Learn more about "Litter"
|
|
|
Litter
Litter is waste disposed of in the wrong place by unlawful human action and can vary in size of incident, occurrence or items. It can occur as small items like wrappers, large collections of waste or scatterings of litter dispersed around public places outdoors. Litter can be occasioned by malicious intent, carelessness, or by accident. Litter has the potential to cause harm to human health, safety, and welfare; it harms wildlife and environmental quality on Earth. Waste abandoned in a private space is not considered litter. The American Public Works Association standardized the term litter in the mid-20th Century, to be later known as a form of solid waste—"…material which, if thrown or deposited, tends to create a danger to public health, safety and welfare." Litter is categorized into three specific components: hazardous, reusable-recyclable and non-hazardous, non-from trash-hauling vehicles, unsecured loads, or construction sites.[Litter. It Costs You.]
Who's to blame for litter?
Francis McAndrew's ''Environmental Psychology'', a textbook used by scholars to explain littering by humans, reports that women, youth, rural dwellers and live-alone peoples litter more than men, seniors, urban dwellers and multi-person households.[McAndrews, Francis. (1993) ''Environmental Psychology''. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.] Picnickers, hunters, fishermen, campers, motorboaters, water skiers, careless pedestrians, motorists, truck drivers, construction and loading dock workers, are prime litter producers. Prototype research by the state of Texas "profiled" litterers being males, youth under age 25, smokers, and frequenters of bars, parties and fast food restaurants. These research results are replicated by many state governments to tailor and enforce litter eradication programs.
Many factors contribute to why people choose to litter. McAndrew argues the "presence of other litter" is a powerful instigator. Studies confirm that ''litter begets litter.'' A "disconnect from reality" – apathy – is a second dynamic. Research by Keep America Beautiful in 1999 found 75 percent of United States|Americans admitted to littering in the previous five years, yet 99 percent of the same surveyed individuals said they enjoyed a clean environment. Negligent, lax law enforcement contributes significantly to this disconnect. Generally, violations must be witnessed to be legally pursued. Inconvenience is another influence. Entitlement is a fourth dynamic to why people litter. A fifth factor is class alienation leading to poor education of individuals. "Dumping is a social activity we learn from...parents and pass on unconsciously to...children." Litterers are "raised badly" by parents--"…vandals with little sense the damage they do." Littering can be motivated "by greed" and ignorance about the law and its actual enforcement, according to a United States Department of Justice document, mentioning the criminal intent of suspects arrested for illegal waste disposal, reassured by lax law enforcement. Finally, governmental neglect influences littering. "Government… followed the path of least resistance…addressing externalities…that may pose…health threats…to nearby communities." Culturally biased indifference by public servants causes some communities to have persistent dumping problems.Effects on the environment
Litter can harm the environment in a number of different ways. It is a breeding ground for disease-causing insects and rodents. Its "ugliness" damages the appearance of scenic environments. Open containers such as paper cups or beverage cans can hold rainwater, providing breeding locations for mosquitoes which have been known to cause diseases such as West Nile Virus and Malaria. Uncollected litter can attract more, flowing into streams, and storm water drainage systems, local bays and estuaries. Animals may get trapped or poisoned with litter in their habitats.Cigarette butts and filters, a threat to wildlife, have been found in the stomachs of fish, birds and whales, who have mistaken them for food. [ "DO MESS">DO MESS WITH IT!: A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and the Role of Southern and Nearby States!]
In March 2008 "The American State Litter Scorecard" ranked the fifty U.S. states on overall quality/effectiveness of litter removal programs and was presented at the American Society for Public Administration National Conference. Best states include Vermont, Minnesota, New Jersey, Iowa, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Wyoming and Virginia. Worst states include Mississippi, Nevada, Louisiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, New Mexico and South Carolina—most being inside the Sun Belt.
History
From ancient Greece to the present day Western hemisphere, humans have thrown unwanted refuse onto streets, countrysides and remote places, unpunished.[DO MESS WITH IT!: A Sociopolitical Study of Littering and the Role of Southern and Nearby States] Prior to reforms within cities in the mid to late 1800s, sanitation was not a priority on governments' lists of things to do. Waste was disposed of by the roadside or in small local dumps. It was unsanitary for local inhabitants and the growing piles of waste led to the spread of disease.The only known pre-modern exception, however, was the Arab Empire, especially in Córdoba, Spain|Cordoba, al-Andalus, which had facilities for litter collection.[S. P. Scott (1904), ''History of the Moorish Empire in Europe'', 3 vols, J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia and London. ]
F. B. Artz (1980), ''The Mind of the Middle Ages'', Third edition revised, University of Chicago Press, pp 148-50.
(cf. References, 1001 Inventions)
In the 14th century, the rise of waste in Europe helped contribute to the bubonic plague. Black rats, carrying the fleas which were the Vector (biology)|vectors for the plague, fed off biodegradable waste discarded by the public.
Legal consequences
Litter can be expensive to clean up, so the act of littering has been made a Fine (penalty)|fineable offense by statute in many places.
In the United States, litter laws, enforcement efforts, and court prosecutions are used to help curtail littering. All three are part of a "comprehensive response to environmental violators", write Epstein and Hammett, researchers for the United States Department of Justice. State laws appear to take precedence over municipal ordinances in controlling litter and act as public safety, not aesthetic measures. Similar state to state, laws define who violators are, the type or "function" of the person committing the action, and what items must be littered or dumped to constitute an illegal act. Municipal ordinances and state statutes by-and-large require "human action" in committing an act of illegal littering or dumping for one to be "held in violation." Some believe anti-litter statutes are "simply not enforced, or with the lowest priority." There is "...a perception law enforcement personnel that environmental crimes are not real crimes." Most states require law enforcement officers to "...witness the illegal act to write a citation." Court prosecutions are important in fighting illegal littering and dumping. A national survey of United States prosecutors noted the most important factor in prosecuting an offense was the "degree of harm" a violation posed and the "criminal intent" of the offender. America's most prosecuted littering offense involve illegal hazardous waste disposals. Civil and crime|criminal fines are the "most common strategy governments use to control environmental behaviors." Most offenders settle outside of court. For small littering, a monetary penalty and/or a specified number of hours picking up litter or community service is typical chastisement. Going to jail for a littering/dumping conviction is still a rarity.[Littering Department of Motor Vehicles, California] Such penalties are often prominently posted on roadside signs.
In Idaho, the Comprehensive Litter Prevention and Abatement Act was signed into law in 2006. Litterers can be fined up to 0 when including a subcharge of USD and be ordered to clean a littered area in the community.[Litter. It Costs You.]
In the UK there is a maximum fine of £2,500 for persistent littering. Different local authorities also have the powers to impose on the spot fines to those caught littering. These are generally under £100.[A site with much information on litter laws in the UK]
Cases are heard in the Magistrates' Court. Approximately 400 people in the UK were prosecuted last year by the police for littering. Alternatively, in some areas offenders could receive a £50 fixed penalty fine for littering from the local authority litter warden. The Offence of Leaving Litter (section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990) says that if a person drops, throws deposits or leaves anything so as to cause defacement in a public place; they could be committing a littering offence. The same applies to litter thrown from cars. Police officers or litter wardens are empowered and trained to deal with offenders. It is also possible for the public to report information about littering incidents to the police, the local authority or a litter warden, who would then decide whether or not they wish to proceed any further. Whilst it is possible to take out a private prosecution, it would be at a person's own expense, and strong evidence would be needed in court to secure a conviction.[http://www.encams.org/home]
Some jurisdictions offer small bounties for the cleaning of litter (for example, requiring people to pay a Container deposit legislation|deposit on bottles, which is only returned when the bottles are returned). In some countries such as Australia, certain areas have a similar scheme but the person bringing the bottle back in gains a small reward.
See also
- Environmentalism
- Recycling
- Waste container
Notes
External links
- Keep America Beautiful
- ENCAMS, Keep Britain Tidy
- Litteraction UK
Category:Crimes
Category:Environment|
Category:Environmentalism|
Category:Green politics
Category:Recycling
Category:Waste
Category:Waste containers
Related Images- California posts the maximum fine on its roadside signs.
- Materials dumped downhill from an unpaved road on state game lands
- Litter floating in an irrigation canal
Sources: StartLearningNow, Wikipedia | Usage license: GNU FDL
 |
Welcome to Start Learning Now.
Explore to your heart's content, and we hope you enjoy reading the material we
have assembled for you here! |
 |
| | | | |
Related News
|
|
Further Resources
|
|
Related Resources
search
|
|
