Please wait while we load your article...

Home > Coup

Learn more about "Coup"

Coup d'état

A '''''coup d’état''''' ( The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language|AHD: tä), often simply called a '''coup''', is the sudden unconstitutional overthrow of a government by a part — usually small — of the state establishment — usually the military — to replace the branch of the stricken government, either with another civil government or with a military government. The ''coup d’état'' succeeds if its opponents fail to thwart the usurpers, allowing them to consolidate their positions, obtain the surrender of the overthrown government or acquiescence of the populace and the surviving armed forces, and thus claim Legitimacy (political science)|legitimacy. ''Coups d’état'' typically use the power of the existing government for the takeover. As Edward Luttwak remarks in ''Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook'': ''A coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder''. In this sense, the use of either military or another organized force is not the defining feature of a coup d'état. Since the unsuccessful ''coups d’état'' of Wolfgang Kapp in 1920 (the Kapp Putsch), and of Adolf Hitler in 1923 (the Beer Hall Putsch), the Helvetism#Swiss expressions that were imported into Standard German|Swiss German word "'''Putsch'''" () (originally coined with the Züriputsch of 1839) is often used also, even in French language|French (such as the putsch of 8 November 1942 and the Algiers putsch of 1961|putsch of April 21, 1961, both in Algiers) and Soviet Union (August Putsch in 1991), while the direct German language|German translation is ''Staatsstreich''.

Usage

Politics|Politically, the ''coup d’état'' is a type of political engineering, generally violent (hence "strike", "blow"; French "''coup''"), but not always, yet differing from a revolution (by a larger, armed group to effect violent, radical change to the political system) in that the change is to ''the government'', not ''the form of government''. Linguistics|Linguistically, ''coup d’état'' is French language|French for “a stroke of state” (''coup'' blow, ''d’'' of ''état'', state).In French, the word "état" is always written with a capital ''É'' ("coup d'État"), as it refers to the sovereign political entity. http://66.46.185.79/bdl/gabarit_bdl.asp?t1=1&id=1285&D=%C9tat Analogously, the term also is casually used to mean gaining advantage on a rival, either by a group or a person, e.g. an ''intelligence coup'', ''boardroom coup''. Tactic (method)|Tactically, a ''coup d’état'' usually involves control by an active portion of the country's military, while neutralizing the remainder of the armed services' possible counteraction. The acting group either captures or expels the political and military leaders, seizes physical control of the most important government offices, means of communication, and the physical infrastructure, such as key streets and electric power plants. A coup d'état is generally without bloodshed.

Etymology

Although the coup d'état has been used in politics since antiquity,Caesar's civil war|Julius Caesar's civil war, 5 January, 49 BC the expression itself is relatively new. Per the Oxford Dictionary, in 1646, Howell first used coup d'État in his book ''Louis XIII: Life of Richelieu''. It was first used in England, in 1811, by Thompson, referring to Napoleon Bonaparte's overthrowing of the Revolutionary Directory in 1799. According to Professor Thomas Childers of the University of Pennsylvania, the lack of an English langauge|English word to denote a sudden, unconstitutional change of government derives from England's political institutions. Although the histories of France and Germany are coloured with such political actions, England's history is not. The last coup d’état in England was the Glorious Revolution in 1688, in which a parliamentarian group headed by William III of England|William of Orange overthrew James II of England|James II, the last Roman Catholic monarch, to establish a modern parliamentary democracy. In England, this is a rare political occurrence, hence there has been no need to coin a descriptive word.

The ''Pronunciamiento''

The ''Pronunciamiento'' is the Spain|Spanish and Hispanic America|Hispano American analogue of the military ''coup d’état'' although "golpe de estado" is a more used expression. ''Pronunciamiento'' (''pronouncement'' in English), refers to the installation, explanation, and justification of the effected ''coup d’état''. Edward Luttwak, explains that the difference between a pronunciamiento and a ''coup d'état'' is that in the latter, ''a military faction'' overthrows the civilian government, whereas a ''pronunciamiento'' is the overthrowing of civilian government ''by official action of the command structure'' (the chiefs of staff) of its military forces.

Recent years

In recent years, the military ''coup d’état'' has declined worldwide as a means of changing government. The usual military intervention in civil government, regarded as a coup d'état, uses the ''threat'' of military force to depose a politically vulnerable or an unpopular leader. In contrast to a traditional coup d'état, the military do not directly assume power, but install a militarily-acceptable civilian leader. The advantage is the appearance of legitimacy; classic examples are the collapse of the French Fourth Republic, and the bloodless coup d'état effected on 3 August 2005, in Mauritania while the president was in Saudi Arabia. There have been examples of the potential for mass street protests to overthrow unpopular leaders, sometimes leading the opposition to take power in a ''coup d’état'' fashion. In such situations, such as in Serbia (5th October (Serbia)|2000), Argentina (2001), the Philippines (People Power Revolution|1986 and EDSA Revolution of 2001|2001), Bolivia (2003), Georgia (country)|Georgia (Rose Revolution|2003), Ukraine (Orange Revolution|2004-2005), Lebanon, Ecuador (2005), and Bolivia (2005), popular uprisings forced the incumbent president or leader to resign so that a new leader might assume power. This often results in economic stability and political calm, in which an unknown and uncontroversial interim leader can govern until proper elections are held. However, these changes of government are not described as ''coups d’état'', because they are not orchestrated by a small group - a key element within the definition - but result from popular massive action, thus generally being described as revolutions. Also, in cases like Argentina in 2001 the crisis was ultimately resolved following the constitution. Another example, the Iranian Revolution of 1979 is such a change of government, led by the Ayatollah Khomeini, because it sprang from popular opposition to the rule of the last Shah of Iran.

Types of coups d’état

A ''coup d’état'' also is classified by the rank of the military men leading the governmental overthrow. A ''Veto coup d’état'' or ''Guardian coup d’état'' is led by the army's top commanding officers (usually generals). Sometimes the commander-in-chief, or a few very top commanders are excluded, as being appointees of the regime and thus loyal to them. In a ''Breakthrough coup d’état'' the leaders are junior officers (colonels or below), or even non-commissioned officers (sergeants), and most of the army's senior officers are displaced too. When junior officers or enlisted men seize power in this way, the ''coup d’état'' also is a mutiny with grave implications for the organizational structure and professional integrity of the military. A '''bloodless coup d’état''' is when the threat of violence is sufficient to depose the incumbent government with no fighting, and there are no subsequent executions of the deposed faction. However, a "bloodless coup d’état" is not always truly non-violent. Napoleon I of France|Napoleon's 18 Brumaire ''coup d’état'' is considered an exemplar "bloodless coup", but during the coup, legislators were forcibly ejected from their meeting place by soldiers. In 1889, Brazil History of Brazil (1889-1930)|became a republic via a bloodless coup. In 1999, Pervez Musharraf assumed power in Pakistan via a bloodless coup, and, in 2006, Sonthi Boonyaratglin assumed power in Thailand as the leader of the Council for Democratic Reform under Constitutional Monarchy. The term '''self-coup''' applies when the incumbent government — aided and abetted by the military — assumes extraordinary powers not allowed by law. The historical example is President, and later French Emperor, Napoleon III|Louis Napoléon Bonaparte. A modern example is Alberto Fujimori#Self-coup|Alberto Fujimori in Peru, who, though elected, in 1992 assumed control of legislative and the judicial branches of government, installing himself as an authoritarian ruler. The assumption of "emergency powers" by King Gyanendra of Nepal|Gyanendra of Nepal was a self-coup. Besides Luttwak's non-military ''coup d’état'', Samuel P. Huntington identifies three classes of ''coup d’état'':
- '''Breakthrough coup d’état''': a revolutionary army overthrows a traditional government and creates a new bureaucratic élite. Generally led by non-commissioned officers (NCOs) or junior officers and happen once. Examples are Xinhai Revolution|China in 1911, Bulgarian coup d'état of 1944|Bulgaria in 1944, Egyptian Revolution of 1952|Egypt in 1952, Greek military junta of 1967-1974|Greece in 1967, History of modern Libya#Qadhafi's Coup d'état|Libya in 1969 and Liberia#1980 Coup d'état under Doe|Liberia in 1980.
- '''Guardian coup d’état''': the "musical chairs" ''coup d’état''. The stated aim of which is improving public order, efficiency, and ending corruption. There usually is no fundamental change to the power structure. Generally, the leaders portray their actions as a temporary and unfortunate necessity. An early example is the ''coup d’état'' by Lucius Cornelius Sulla|Sulla, in 88 B.C., replacing the elected leader Gaius Marius the Younger|Marius in Roman Republic|Rome. A contemporary instance is the civilian Prime Minister of Pakistan Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's overthrow by Chief of Army Staff of the Pakistan Army|Chief of Army Staff General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq in 1977, who cited widespread civil disorder and impending civil war as his justification. In 1999, General Pervez Musharraf overthrew Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on the same grounds. Nations with guardian coups can frequently shift back and forth between civilian and military governments. Example countries include Pakistan, Turkey, and Thailand. A “bloodless coup” usually arises from the Guardian coup d’état.
- '''Veto coup d’état''': occurs when the army vetoes the people's mass participation and social mobilisation in governing themselves. In such a case, the army confronts and suppresses large-scale, broad-based civil opposition, tending to fascist repression and killing, the prime example is the coup d’état in Chilean coup of 1973|Chile in 1973 against the elected Socialist President Salvador Allende Gossens by the Chilean military, aided by the CIA.

Post-military-coup governments

After the ''coup d’état'', the military face the matter of what type of government to establish. In Latin America, it was common for the post-coup government to be led by a Military dictatorship|junta, a committee of the chiefs of staff of the armed forces. A common form of African post-coup government is the revolutionary assembly, a quasi-legislative body elected by the army. In Pakistan, the military leader typically assumes the title of chief martial law administrator. According to Huntington, most leaders of a ''coup d’état'' act under the concept of ''right orders'': they believe that the best resolution of the country's problems is merely ''to issue correct orders''. This view of government underestimates the difficulty of implementing government policy, and the degree of political resistance to certain correct orders. It presupposes that everyone who matters in the country shares a single, common interest, and that the only question is ''how'' to pursue that single, common interest.

Incumbent leaders of regimes who assumed power via a ''coup d’état''

*Both Jammeh and Bozizé were subsequently confirmed in office by apparently free and fair electionsGambia, TheFreedom House: Central African Republic, 2008. The election confirming Jammeh was marked by repression of the free press and the oppositionFreedom House: The Gambia, 2008. An opposition leader described the outcome as a "sham".

Notes

References

- Curzio Malaparte, ''Technique du Coup d'État'' (Published in French), Paris, 1931
- D. J. Goodspeed, ''Six Coups d'État'', Viking Press inc., New-York, 1962
- Edward Luttwak, ''Coup d'état: A practical handbook'', Harvard University Press, 1969, 1980. ISBN 06-741-75476
- Ken Connor and David Hebditch, ''How to Stage a Military Coup: From Planning to Execution'', Pen and Sword Books Ltd, 2008, ISBN 9781848325036 Category:Coups| Category:Civil-military relations Category:French words and phrases simple:Coup d'etat

Related Images

Sources: StartLearningNow, Wikipedia | Usage license: GNU FDL

Welcome to Start Learning Now. Explore to your heart's content, and we hope you enjoy reading the material we have assembled for you here!

Related News

Further Resources


	home lucky pick

Related Resources